All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Finkargo vs LendingClub (2016 crisis)

Finkargo failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. LendingClub (2016 crisis) failed in 2016 due to Founder Chaos. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Finkargo🔥 LendingClub (2016 crisis)
SectorFintechFintech
CountryColombiaUSA
Founded20212006
Died20232016
Raised$30M$1.3B
Peak$30M raised$9B valuation
Primary CauseUnit EconomicsFounder Chaos

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Finkargo
Unit Economics
Finkargo provided supply chain financing to Colombian SMEs importing goods, allowing them to finance international purchase orders. After raising $30M, rising global interest rates in 2022-2023 increased Finkargo's cost of capital while simultaneously increasing default rates as import businesses struggled with currency depreciation and higher shipping costs. The company shut down in 2023.
// LESSON
Import trade finance has triple macro exposure: USD funding costs, local currency depreciation, and global shipping disruption. Model all three simultaneously at stress levels before underwriting a single loan.
🔥 LendingClub (2016 crisis)
Founder Chaos
LendingClub CEO Renaud Laplanche resigned in May 2016 after an internal review found that $22M in loans had been sold to an investor with falsified application dates, and that Laplanche had failed to disclose a personal conflict of interest. The stock fell 50% in a single day. LendingClub survived but spent years rebuilding institutional trust.
// LESSON
For marketplace lenders, loan data integrity is the product. Falsifying origination dates is not a compliance technicality — it invalidates every institutional investor's credit risk model and destroys the trust that marketplace lending is built on.

// EXPLORE FURTHER